🔗 Share this article

Whenever a prominent awards ceremony approaches, there’s always an outcry to include additional classifications to acknowledge unsung work and delight the hearts of enthusiasts with niche passions.

Another commentator made the case advocating for terror-themed awards. That would be fantastic. Equally deserving are strategy board titles, this being someone's personal cause. But they will have to forgive me when I prioritize just as with other single-minded supporters, I possess a compelling case supporting my request is the most urgent and significant. The demand is this: There should be a category for puzzle games.

Organizing Gaming Categories

Categorizing art by genre is not a science; it remains highly personal, and it will always start arguments resulting in unclear classifications. There’s a reason movie academies don’t do it. But it is a necessary evil for the industry of gaming, that demonstrate such variety they hardly constitute as a single art form.

For the full spectrum of gaming accomplishments to receive acknowledgment, and to ensure all game types to have a chance for representation, specific award classifications remain vital.

Present Award Structure

The major gaming awards presently include classifications covering Action, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Between them, these six categories actually cover many game types, making space possible accommodating various experiences.

Different situation exists for logic-based experiences. No appropriate category exists to put them. Consider three of recent excellent titles, showing diverse approaches: the architectural riddles from a specific release, the pulse-pounding block-matching in a different title, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles in another game. Where could they possibly go among existing types? Unfortunately, nowhere.

The Representation Problem

Many instances occur excellent brain-teasers released every year that have no home in entertainment awards, if they accidentally match classification types such as Mobile Game, Virtual reality experiences, and the highly challenging Indie races.

• An iconic brain-teaser received no recognition completely in 2014
• A different innovative game was excluded that year
• A beloved organization game was overlooked in 2021
• Only a few logic titles barely qualified for independent or mobile categories

Importance of Logic Titles

These are often compact experiences, but the art behind logic titles carries substantial weight. Well-known matching games rank among most engaged experiences globally and have been for an extended period.

The famous puzzle experience competes with famous sandbox experiences competing to become highest-selling title ever; it also contends as greatest title ever. Logic titles represent cornerstones to the art of video games, and they are in conversation across multiple categories.

The Solution and Justification

Puzzle games wouldn’t have that issue. You could fill five nominees with fascinating, diverse, deserving games every year with ease — or rather, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave so many good games out.

To emphasize again, these represent titles that otherwise have no home in important events. Brain-teaser creators function at the challenging frontier interactive creation, creating some of essential manifestations of gaming itself. Comparable to movie stunt professionals, they warrant appreciation. Let’s not keep them waiting generations.